Choosing the Right Partner for Your Website
The difference between a vendor and a partner shows up long before the contract is signed
I’ve responded to (more than) my share of RFPs, and I’ve inherited a lot of websites from firms that won the last one. The pattern I keep seeing has less to do with which firm gets selected than with what the client thought they were hiring in the first place.
Most public sector selections start with the wrong question. The question isn't “who’s the best web firm we can afford?” It’s “are we hiring a vendor, or are we hiring a partner?” The answer changes what you ask for, how you evaluate the responses, and what you should pay attention to in the first conversations.
A vendor sells you a website. You write a spec, they build to it, you sign off, they move on. The relationship has a clear beginning, a clear end, and a clear deliverable. A partner takes responsibility for whether the site keeps working, for the people you serve, over time. You define goals together, you make decisions together, and when something breaks two years in there's someone to call who remembers why you built it the way you did.
Both models exist in the market, and both call themselves the same things in their marketing. The job of your selection process is to figure out which one is actually sitting across the table from you.
The five factors below are how I’d do that. Each one is a way of testing whether a firm is set up to be a partner or set up to be a vendor — and whether they’re being honest with you about which one they are.